Category: edci335

Post 1

In my life, I have experienced learning through different educational perspectives: behaviorism, cognitivism, and constructivism. Let me share with you a personal example of each approach.

Behaviorism: When I was in elementary school, I vividly remember learning multiplication tables. The teacher used behaviorist techniques, employing repetition, drill exercises, and positive reinforcement. We would recite the tables aloud, practice solving multiplication problems repeatedly, and receive rewards for correct answers. The focus was on memorization and the proper response, with little emphasis on understanding the underlying concepts. While this approach helped me quickly recall multiplication facts, it didn’t necessarily foster a deep understanding of multiplication as a mathematical operation.

Cognitivism: In high school, I took a biology course where we learned about cellular respiration. The teacher employed a cognitivist approach by engaging us in active learning strategies. We were presented with diagrams, animations, and real-life examples to explain the complex process. We were encouraged to think critically, question, and connect new information with prior knowledge. The teacher facilitated class discussions, conducted thought-provoking activities, and assigned projects that required us to apply our knowledge. This approach helped me better understand cellular respiration and the interconnectedness of biological processes.

Constructivism: During my college years, I enrolled in a philosophy course where we studied ethics. The instructor adopted a constructivist approach that empowered us to construct our understanding of ethical theories and principles. Instead of lecturing, the instructor facilitated class debates, encouraged us to challenge assumptions, and provided various perspectives. We critically reflected, analyzed case studies, and collaborated on group projects. This approach allowed us to actively participate in learning, develop our ethical frameworks, and apply them to real-world situations.

These experiences highlight the diverse approaches to learning and their impact on knowledge acquisition. While behaviorism focused on rote memorization, cognitivism emphasized understanding and critical thinking, and constructivism promoted active engagement, collaboration, and the construction of personal meaning.

Based on my reading and reflection, my current instruction style is predominantly constructivist. I believe in creating a learner-centered environment that encourages active participation, critical thinking, and applying knowledge in real-world contexts. By providing opportunities for inquiry, collaboration, and reflection, I aim to foster a deeper and more meaningful learning experience for my students.